PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCMVX vs. VVOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCMVX achieves a 14.74% return, which is significantly lower than VVOAX's 23.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MCMVX has underperformed VVOAX with an annualized return of 12.92%, while VVOAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.34% annualized return.


MCMVX

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.66%
YTD
14.74%
6M
14.08%
1Y
27.78%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
12.92%

VVOAX

1D
-0.21%
1M
5.46%
YTD
23.71%
6M
23.38%
1Y
49.58%
3Y*
31.96%
5Y*
18.32%
10Y*
16.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
14.74%9.74%15.38%12.18%-7.73%22.57%13.24%26.98%-8.15%20.85%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
23.71%20.24%30.01%15.20%1.33%35.60%5.49%29.84%-19.92%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MCMVX and VVOAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2013

0.86

The correlation between MCMVX and VVOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCMVX vs. VVOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCMVX
MCMVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MCMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MCMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

VVOAX
VVOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VVOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VVOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) and Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCMVXVVOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.48

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

5.45

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.85

19.47

-7.62

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCMVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the VVOAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCMVX and VVOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCMVXVVOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.81

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.41

+0.27

Drawdowns

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCMVX drawdown since its inception was -36.75%, smaller than the maximum VVOAX drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCMVX and VVOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCMVXVVOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.75%

-62.08%

+25.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.56%

-9.21%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.06%

-24.05%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.06%

-24.05%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.75%

-51.80%

+15.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.21%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-11.73%

+7.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.56%

-0.23%

Volatility

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monongahela All Cap Value Fund (MCMVX) is 4.46%, while Invesco Value Opportunities Fund (VVOAX) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that MCMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCMVXVVOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

6.15%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

13.85%

-3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

17.90%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

21.16%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

24.20%

-6.15%

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than VVOAX's 1.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCMVX vs. VVOAX - Dividend Comparison

MCMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, less than VVOAX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCMVX
Monongahela All Cap Value Fund
5.67%6.51%5.41%3.23%4.79%7.61%1.25%3.09%6.87%10.44%2.13%1.75%
VVOAX
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund
8.43%10.43%7.79%2.27%9.79%8.82%0.25%1.95%15.44%5.11%1.10%15.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCMVX and VVOAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VVOAX has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to MCMVX (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCMVX dropped -36.75% vs VVOAX's -62.08%.

VVOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCMVX and VVOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer