MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE
MCHN.DE (Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc) and FWEA.DE (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MCHN.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select, while FWEA.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MCHN.DE returned 12.33% vs 25.98% for FWEA.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MCHN.DE charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FWEA.DE.
Performance
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCHN.DE achieves a -0.35% return, which is significantly lower than FWEA.DE's 10.64% return.
MCHN.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -0.35%
- 6M
- -1.47%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- -2.96%
- 10Y*
- —
FWEA.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.58%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MCHN.DE Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc | -0.35% | 13.01% | 25.16% | -8.59% |
FWEA.DE Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF | 10.64% | 17.53% | 19.21% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCHN.DE and FWEA.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
MCHN.DE
FWEA.DE
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MCHN.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.43 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.18 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.63 | 13.52 | -10.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MCHN.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 2.30 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 1.51 | -1.62 |
Drawdowns
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCHN.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.79%, which is greater than FWEA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHN.DE and FWEA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCHN.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.79% | -17.48% | -28.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.21% | -8.28% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.30% | -0.81% | -15.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.07% | -1.86% | -22.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 1.95% | +2.86% |
Volatility
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect UCITS ETF Acc (MCHN.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (FWEA.DE) at 3.36%. This indicates that MCHN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWEA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCHN.DE | FWEA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 3.36% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 8.93% | +2.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.86% | 11.45% | +5.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 12.72% | +12.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.77% | 12.72% | +12.05% |
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MCHN.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FWEA.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
MCHN.DE vs. FWEA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither MCHN.DE nor FWEA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCHN.DE and FWEA.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for MCHN.DE.
MCHN.DE is categorized as China Equities, while FWEA.DE is Global Equities. MCHN.DE tracks MSCI China All Shares Stock Connect Select, while FWEA.DE tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for MCHN.DE and 0.20% for FWEA.DE.
Find the right allocation for MCHN.DE and FWEA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer