PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCHFX vs. ITOCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and Itochu Corp ADR (ITOCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCHFX achieves a -3.14% return, which is significantly higher than ITOCY's -6.92% return. Over the past 10 years, MCHFX has underperformed ITOCY with an annualized return of 6.23%, while ITOCY has yielded a comparatively higher 18.35% annualized return.


MCHFX

1D
-2.69%
1M
-3.81%
6M
-8.20%
YTD
-3.14%
1Y
10.82%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
-6.87%
10Y*
6.23%

ITOCY

1D
1.55%
1M
0.00%
6M
-8.97%
YTD
-6.92%
1Y
12.79%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
15.35%
10Y*
18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCHFX
Matthews China Fund
-3.14%29.82%17.84%-19.21%-24.38%-19.41%43.07%34.57%-21.17%59.08%
ITOCY
Itochu Corp ADR
-6.92%30.16%22.57%30.30%1.54%6.60%24.95%38.77%-5.54%46.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MCHFX and ITOCY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2006

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCHFX vs. ITOCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCHFX
MCHFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
MCHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOCY
ITOCY Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ITOCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) and Itochu Corp ADR (ITOCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCHFXITOCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.10

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

0.52

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

1.23

+0.73

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCHFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is comparable to the ITOCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCHFX and ITOCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCHFX drawdown since its inception was -67.02%, roughly equal to the maximum ITOCY drawdown of -69.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCHFX and ITOCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCHFXITOCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.02%

-69.11%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.58%

-24.49%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.77%

-26.47%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.71%

-30.18%

-28.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.75%

-30.18%

-34.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.26%

-19.71%

-20.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.16%

-14.30%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.10%

10.39%

-4.29%

Volatility

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Volatility Comparison

Matthews China Fund (MCHFX) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to Itochu Corp ADR (ITOCY) at 5.56%. This indicates that MCHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCHFXITOCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

5.56%

+2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

20.40%

-3.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

26.83%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.11%

26.25%

+3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.71%

23.93%

+2.78%

Dividends

MCHFX vs. ITOCY - Dividend Comparison

MCHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, while ITOCY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOCY
Itochu Corp ADR
0.00%1.07%1.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.85%3.93%2.83%3.68%3.30%
MCHFX
Matthews China Fund
1.40%1.36%1.91%0.78%7.53%6.54%1.25%1.12%22.28%10.31%13.66%19.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCHFX and ITOCY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCHFX has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to ITOCY (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCHFX dropped -67.02% vs ITOCY's -69.11%.

MCHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCHFX and ITOCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer