PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCFTX vs. ANCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS California Municipal Bond Fund (MCFTX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCFTX achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than ANCFX's 14.46% return. Over the past 10 years, MCFTX has underperformed ANCFX with an annualized return of 1.79%, while ANCFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.45% annualized return.


MCFTX

1D
0.00%
1M
-2.50%
6M
-0.33%
YTD
0.34%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
1.79%
ALL TIME*
4.41%

ANCFX

1D
1.11%
1M
1.08%
6M
11.13%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
23.67%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
14.45%
ALL TIME*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MCFTX
MFS California Municipal Bond Fund
0.34%4.06%2.46%6.33%-12.26%2.95%4.02%8.58%0.96%6.17%
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
14.46%24.21%22.73%25.86%-16.66%22.43%14.92%27.07%-8.13%22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MCFTX and ANCFX is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 1985

0.03

The correlation between MCFTX and ANCFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCFTX vs. ANCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCFTX
MCFTX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MCFTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ANCFX
ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS California Municipal Bond Fund (MCFTX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCFTXANCFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.57

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.20

11.08

-4.88

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCFTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the ANCFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCFTX and ANCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCFTX drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum ANCFX drawdown of -53.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCFTX and ANCFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCFTXANCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-53.29%

+34.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.38%

-10.66%

+7.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.44%

-17.97%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.33%

-25.07%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.46%

-33.93%

+15.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.59%

-1.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-7.30%

+4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

2.47%

-1.49%

Volatility

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS California Municipal Bond Fund (MCFTX) is 1.25%, while American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that MCFTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCFTXANCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

4.40%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.92%

12.14%

-9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57%

15.13%

-11.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

17.02%

-12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.74%

17.77%

-13.03%

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCFTX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ANCFX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCFTX vs. ANCFX - Dividend Comparison

MCFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than ANCFX's 7.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
7.28%8.54%8.90%5.80%4.98%10.97%2.61%6.91%9.31%7.28%4.71%6.08%
MCFTX
MFS California Municipal Bond Fund
3.33%4.63%3.15%2.81%2.17%2.27%2.60%3.23%3.47%3.62%3.59%3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCFTX and ANCFX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANCFX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to MCFTX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCFTX dropped -18.59% vs ANCFX's -53.29%.

ANCFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCFTX and ANCFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer