PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCDWX vs. EXDVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDWX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than EXDVX's -0.23% return.


MCDWX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.21%
6M
0.17%
YTD
0.57%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
1.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.51%

EXDVX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.09%
6M
-0.94%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
2.38%
5Y*
0.33%
10Y*
1.34%
ALL TIME*
1.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
0.57%7.57%4.13%7.31%-11.13%0.01%8.77%
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
-0.23%4.30%0.41%4.10%-5.83%0.16%3.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MCDWX and EXDVX is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2020

0.51

The correlation between MCDWX and EXDVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCDWX vs. EXDVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MCDWX
MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EXDVX
EXDVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EXDVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXDVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXDVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EXDVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXDVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCDWXEXDVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.47

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.38

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

3.90

+1.51

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCDWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the EXDVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCDWX and EXDVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDWX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than EXDVX's maximum drawdown of -12.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDWX and EXDVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCDWXEXDVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-12.74%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-2.44%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.68%

-3.74%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

-9.29%

-6.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.80%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-2.18%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

0.86%

-0.12%

Volatility

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund (EXDVX) have volatilities of 0.69% and 0.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCDWXEXDVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

0.67%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

1.46%

+0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

1.79%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

2.71%

+1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.34%

2.97%

+1.37%

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDWX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EXDVX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCDWX vs. EXDVX - Dividend Comparison

MCDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than EXDVX's 2.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXDVX
Manning & Napier Divrs Tax Exempt Series Fund
2.36%2.26%1.87%1.67%0.61%6.02%1.69%2.81%1.38%1.25%1.10%0.86%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
4.55%4.83%4.41%4.48%3.25%4.45%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCDWX and EXDVX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCDWX has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to EXDVX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCDWX dropped -15.96% vs EXDVX's -12.74%.

EXDVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCDWX and EXDVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer