PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCDWX vs. DFXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCDWX achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFXIX's 0.94% return.


MCDWX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.69%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
5.54%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

DFXIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.94%
6M
0.84%
1Y
4.66%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
0.56%7.57%4.13%7.31%-11.13%0.01%8.77%
DFXIX
DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio
0.94%5.85%3.05%4.93%-7.88%-0.56%1.40%

Correlation

The correlation between MCDWX and DFXIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2020

0.87

The correlation between MCDWX and DFXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCDWX vs. DFXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCDWX
MCDWX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MCDWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCDWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCDWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MCDWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCDWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

DFXIX
DFXIX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DFXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DFXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) and DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MCDWXDFXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

2.78

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.42

8.50

-0.08

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCDWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the DFXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCDWX and DFXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MCDWXDFXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

1.80

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.56

+0.03

Drawdowns

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCDWX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than DFXIX's maximum drawdown of -10.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCDWX and DFXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCDWXDFXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.96%

-10.51%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-1.69%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.22%

-2.00%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.96%

-10.51%

-5.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-0.66%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-2.31%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.55%

+0.11%

Volatility

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Credit Series (MCDWX) has a higher volatility of 1.06% compared to DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio (DFXIX) at 0.84%. This indicates that MCDWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCDWXDFXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

0.84%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

1.85%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

2.61%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

3.59%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.38%

29.58%

-25.20%

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCDWX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DFXIX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MCDWX vs. DFXIX - Dividend Comparison

MCDWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, more than DFXIX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFXIX
DFA Diversified Fixed Income Portfolio
3.70%3.21%3.72%3.02%2.69%2.31%1.39%102.11%2.10%1.09%
MCDWX
Manning & Napier Credit Series
4.47%4.83%4.41%4.48%3.25%4.45%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCDWX and DFXIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCDWX has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to DFXIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCDWX dropped -15.96% vs DFXIX's -10.51%.

MCDWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCDWX and DFXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer