MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS
MCDOWELL-N.NS (United Spirits Limited) and LT.NS (Larsen & Toubro Limited) are both stocks. MCDOWELL-N.NS operates in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries (Consumer Defensive), while LT.NS operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials). At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MCDOWELL-N.NS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
LT.NS
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -8.80%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- -5.07%
- 1Y
- 11.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.71%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 30.68%
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MCDOWELL-N.NS United Spirits Limited | 0.00% | -10.98% |
LT.NS Larsen & Toubro Limited | -5.07% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCDOWELL-N.NS and LT.NS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS — Risk / Return Rank
MCDOWELL-N.NS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LT.NS
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Spirits Limited (MCDOWELL-N.NS) and Larsen & Toubro Limited (LT.NS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCDOWELL-N.NS | LT.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.60 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCDOWELL-N.NS | LT.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -54.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -12.26% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -14.46% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCDOWELL-N.NS | LT.NS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 25.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 24.62% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 31.02% | — |
Dividends
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Dividend Comparison
MCDOWELL-N.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LT.NS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LT.NS Larsen & Toubro Limited | 0.99% | 0.83% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 1.05% | 0.95% | 2.80% | 1.39% | 1.11% | 1.11% | 2.03% |
MCDOWELL-N.NS United Spirits Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MCDOWELL-N.NS vs. LT.NS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Spirits Limited and Larsen & Toubro Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MCDOWELL-N.NS and LT.NS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MCDOWELL-N.NS and LT.NS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer