MCD vs. TSLA
MCD (McDonald's Corporation) and TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MCD in Restaurants, TSLA in Auto Manufacturers. Over the past 10 years, MCD returned 11.46%/yr vs 39.72%/yr for TSLA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MCD vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, MCD has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 11.46%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 39.72% annualized return.
MCD
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- -5.66%
- 6M
- -8.96%
- 1Y
- -3.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.46%
TSLA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -9.63%
- 6M
- -11.45%
- 1Y
- 24.94%
- 3Y*
- 16.25%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 39.72%
MCD vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | -5.66% | 7.89% | 0.14% | 15.06% | 0.51% | 27.79% | 11.30% | 13.97% | 5.78% | 45.05% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | -9.63% | 11.36% | 62.52% | 101.72% | -65.03% | 49.76% | 743.44% | 25.70% | 6.89% | 45.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MCD and TSLA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2010 | 0.15 |
The correlation between MCD and TSLA shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MCD:
$203.21B
TSLA:
$1.44T
MCD:
$12.13
TSLA:
$1.10
MCD:
23.48
TSLA:
370.20
MCD:
3.78
TSLA:
45.29
MCD:
7.42
TSLA:
14.66
MCD:
$27.45B
TSLA:
$97.88B
MCD:
$12.10B
TSLA:
$18.66B
MCD:
$14.46B
TSLA:
$10.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MCD vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank
MCD
TSLA
MCD vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MCD | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.13 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 0.92 | -1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.50 | 2.10 | -2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MCD vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and TSLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MCD | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -73.63% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -29.93% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.05% | -53.77% | +34.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.05% | -73.63% | +54.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.90% | -73.63% | +36.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -17.03% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -22.72% | +7.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.53% | 13.06% | -5.53% |
Volatility
MCD vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 4.96%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 14.25%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MCD | TSLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 14.25% | -9.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 28.73% | -16.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.62% | 44.49% | -27.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 58.98% | -41.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 59.14% | -38.74% |
Dividends
MCD vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison
MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while TSLA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCD McDonald's Corporation | 2.58% | 2.35% | 2.34% | 2.10% | 2.15% | 1.96% | 2.35% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.23% | 2.97% | 2.91% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MCD vs. TSLA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McDonald's Corporation and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MCD vs. TSLA - Profitability Comparison
MCD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TSLA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.72B and revenue of 22.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
MCD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported an operating income of 2.95B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.3%.
TSLA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported an operating income of 941.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.
MCD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, McDonald's Corporation reported a net income of 1.98B and revenue of 6.52B, resulting in a net margin of 30.4%.
TSLA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesla, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 22.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MCD and TSLA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLA has higher volatility (14.25%) compared to MCD (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs TSLA's -73.63%.
TSLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MCD and TSLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer