MCD vs. AIS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MCD (McDonald's Corporation) is a stock, while AIS (VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by VistaShares. Over the past year, MCD returned -3.75% vs 190.94% for AIS. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MCD vs. AIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCD achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than AIS's 112.52% return.

MCD

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: -9.28%
• 6M: -11.51%
• 1Y: -3.75%
• 3Y*: 0.46%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 11.30%

AIS

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 12.41%
• YTD: 112.52%
• 6M: 111.68%
• 1Y: 190.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCD vs. AIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MCD McDonald's Corporation	-9.28%	7.89%	-0.87%
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	112.52%	58.35%	-4.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MCD and AIS is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.25
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024	-0.17

Return for Risk

MCD vs. AIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCD

MCD Risk / Return Rank: 32
MCD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
MCD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
MCD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
MCD Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
MCD Martin Ratio Rank: 35

AIS

AIS Risk / Return Rank: 96
AIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
AIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
AIS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCD vs. AIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) and VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MCD	AIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	4.64	-4.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.20	4.32	-4.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.62	-0.65
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	12.13	-12.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	36.93	-37.41

MCD vs. AIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCD Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the AIS Sharpe Ratio of 4.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCD and AIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MCD vs. AIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCD drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than AIS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCD and AIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MCD	AIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.20%	-32.78%	-40.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.82%	-15.84%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.70%	-9.21%	-9.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.90%	-5.49%	-9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.00%	5.19%	+2.81%

Volatility

MCD vs. AIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is 5.87%, while VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF (AIS) has a volatility of 23.81%. This indicates that MCD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MCD	AIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	23.81%	-17.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.42%	36.23%	-23.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	41.62%	-24.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	41.04%	-23.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.44%	41.04%	-20.60%

Dividends

MCD vs. AIS - Dividend Comparison

MCD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, while AIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AIS VistaShares Artificial Intelligence Supercycle ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MCD McDonald's Corporation	2.68%	2.35%	2.34%	2.10%	2.15%	1.96%	2.35%	2.39%	2.36%	2.23%	2.97%	2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MCD and AIS in my portfolio?

MCD and AIS have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MCD or AIS?

AIS has higher volatility (23.81%) compared to MCD (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCD dropped -73.20% vs AIS's -32.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.64 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.