MBXAX vs. PCBAX
MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) and PCBAX (BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX returned 7.41%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for PCBAX. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MBXAX charges 2.18%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for PCBAX.
Performance
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBXAX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than PCBAX's 10.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX has outperformed PCBAX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while PCBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.79% annualized return.
MBXAX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -2.04%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.86%
PCBAX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- YTD
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 11.12%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.30%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 12.74% | 4.13% | 13.17% | -0.91% | 7.46% | 16.62% | -0.72% | 13.59% | -2.43% | 13.69% |
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 10.12% | 6.16% | 11.77% | 2.37% | 5.77% | 0.29% | 6.50% | 1.41% | 4.32% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBXAX and PCBAX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBXAX vs. PCBAX — Risk / Return Rank
MBXAX
PCBAX
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBXAX | PCBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 3.75 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 8.93 | +5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBXAX drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, smaller than the maximum PCBAX drawdown of -39.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXAX and PCBAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBXAX | PCBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -39.55% | +7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.89% | -3.04% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.66% | -6.75% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.66% | -6.75% | -8.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.75% | -9.00% | -22.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -0.06% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -4.35% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.27% | -0.22% |
Volatility
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund (PCBAX) have volatilities of 1.59% and 1.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBXAX | PCBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.59% | 1.63% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.87% | 4.73% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.87% | 5.78% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 6.47% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 6.10% | +7.26% |
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBXAX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than PCBAX's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBXAX vs. PCBAX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MBXAX nor PCBAX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.43% | 2.02% | 7.57% | 0.00% | 3.92% | 4.96% | 3.07% | 3.35% | 1.82% | 0.00% |
PCBAX BlackRock Tactical Opportunities Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.67% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 2.44% | 3.08% | 9.91% | 0.80% | 1.41% | 4.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBXAX and PCBAX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCBAX has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to MBXAX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXAX dropped -31.75% vs PCBAX's -39.55%.
MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBXAX and PCBAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer