PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBXAX vs. JDIEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXAX achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than JDIEX's 8.68% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX has underperformed JDIEX with an annualized return of 8.29%, while JDIEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.00% annualized return.


MBXAX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
12.96%
6M
13.93%
1Y
19.58%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
8.29%

JDIEX

1D
0.06%
1M
3.04%
YTD
8.68%
6M
8.61%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
12.96%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%
JDIEX
Easterly Hedged Equity Fund
8.68%11.87%17.36%14.58%-2.74%11.25%7.57%12.11%1.56%6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXAX and JDIEX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.49

The correlation between MBXAX and JDIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBXAX vs. JDIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

JDIEX
JDIEX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JDIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
JDIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBXAXJDIEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

3.03

-0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.38

4.43

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.60

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.34

5.46

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.68

21.58

-0.90

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the JDIEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXAX and JDIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBXAXJDIEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

3.03

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.97

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.84

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.82

-0.14

Drawdowns

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXAX drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than JDIEX's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXAX and JDIEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXAXJDIEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-17.63%

-14.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.89%

-3.49%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-10.66%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.66%

-17.57%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.75%

-17.63%

-14.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

0.00%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-2.53%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.88%

+0.12%

Volatility

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to Easterly Hedged Equity Fund (JDIEX) at 1.29%. This indicates that MBXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JDIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXAXJDIEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.29%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

4.71%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

6.31%

+0.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.54%

11.29%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

10.72%

+2.70%

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXAX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than JDIEX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBXAX vs. JDIEX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MBXAX nor JDIEX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JDIEX
Easterly Hedged Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.09%0.23%2.45%10.68%8.01%1.99%10.75%2.57%0.11%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBXAX and JDIEX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBXAX has higher volatility (1.89%) compared to JDIEX (1.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXAX dropped -31.75% vs JDIEX's -17.63%.

JDIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBXAX and JDIEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer