PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBXAX vs. IIXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXAX achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than IIXIX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX has outperformed IIXIX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while IIXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.44% annualized return.


MBXAX

1D
0.58%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.56%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
7.08%
10Y*
8.33%

IIXIX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.04%
YTD
1.05%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
6.41%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
3.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
13.33%4.13%13.17%-0.91%7.46%16.62%-0.72%13.59%-2.43%13.69%
IIXIX
Catalyst Insider Income Fund
1.05%5.51%7.10%8.24%-8.92%1.79%6.60%5.69%3.20%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXAX and IIXIX is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.16

The correlation between MBXAX and IIXIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBXAX vs. IIXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBXAX
MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

IIXIX
IIXIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IIXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IIXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBXAXIIXIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.08

2.11

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.55

4.23

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.70

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

4.17

+1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.04

18.16

+2.88

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the IIXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXAX and IIXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBXAXIIXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08

2.11

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.98

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.72

-0.03

Drawdowns

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXAX drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than IIXIX's maximum drawdown of -11.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXAX and IIXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBXAXIIXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-11.43%

-20.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.89%

-1.08%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.66%

-1.76%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.66%

-11.27%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.75%

-11.43%

-20.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.11%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-1.85%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

0.25%

+0.75%

Volatility

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Catalyst Insider Income Fund (IIXIX) at 0.58%. This indicates that MBXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IIXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBXAXIIXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

0.58%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.18%

1.53%

+3.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.03%

2.01%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.54%

3.41%

+8.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.42%

3.52%

+9.90%

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXAX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IIXIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBXAX vs. IIXIX - Dividend Comparison

MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IIXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IIXIX
Catalyst Insider Income Fund
4.68%4.70%4.05%4.10%3.17%2.40%3.50%2.99%2.41%2.33%2.20%2.22%
MBXAX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund
0.00%0.00%2.43%2.02%7.57%0.00%3.92%4.96%3.07%3.35%1.82%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBXAX and IIXIX have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MBXAX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to IIXIX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXAX dropped -31.75% vs IIXIX's -11.43%.

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBXAX and IIXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer