MBXAX vs. CGFIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MBXAX (Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund) and CGFIX (abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund) are both Macro Trading funds. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX returned 8.33%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for CGFIX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MBXAX charges 2.18%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CGFIX.

Performance

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBXAX achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than CGFIX's 1.26% return. Over the past 10 years, MBXAX has outperformed CGFIX with an annualized return of 8.33%, while CGFIX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.

MBXAX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -0.02%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 14.56%
• 1Y: 21.06%
• 3Y*: 11.49%
• 5Y*: 7.08%
• 10Y*: 8.33%

CGFIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 1.26%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: 4.62%
• 5Y*: 0.28%
• 10Y*: 1.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	13.33%	4.13%	13.17%	-0.91%	7.46%	16.62%	-0.72%	13.59%	-2.43%	13.69%
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	1.26%	5.79%	4.85%	-2.54%	-9.99%	1.39%	6.37%	7.26%	0.97%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between MBXAX and CGFIX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	-0.02

The correlation between MBXAX and CGFIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (3 years) to -0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MBXAX vs. CGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBXAX

MBXAX Risk / Return Rank: 92
MBXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
MBXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MBXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
MBXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MBXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CGFIX

CGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 45
CGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
CGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
CGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
CGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
CGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) and abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MBXAX	CGFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.08	2.05	+1.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.55	2.94	+1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.39	+0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.41	2.35	+3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.04	8.48	+12.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBXAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.08, which is higher than the CGFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBXAX and CGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MBXAX	CGFIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.08	2.05	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.05	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.40	+0.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.89	-0.21

Drawdowns

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBXAX drawdown since its inception was -31.75%, which is greater than CGFIX's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBXAX and CGFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MBXAX	CGFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.75%	-20.28%	-11.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.89%	-2.78%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.66%	-7.09%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.66%	-20.28%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.75%	-20.28%	-11.47%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-1.76%	+1.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.05%	-3.19%	-0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	0.77%	+0.23%

Volatility

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund (MBXAX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund (CGFIX) at 1.11%. This indicates that MBXAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MBXAX	CGFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.86%	1.11%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.18%	2.33%	+2.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.03%	3.15%	+3.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.54%	5.76%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	4.73%	+8.69%

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBXAX has a 2.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CGFIX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

MBXAX vs. CGFIX - Dividend Comparison

MBXAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CGFIX abrdn Global Absolute Return Strategies Fund	6.15%	5.51%	6.43%	2.08%	0.00%	7.49%	0.23%	3.29%	6.05%	0.33%	1.12%	0.35%
MBXAX Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.43%	2.02%	7.57%	0.00%	3.92%	4.96%	3.07%	3.35%	1.82%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MBXAX and CGFIX in my portfolio?

MBXAX and CGFIX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MBXAX or CGFIX?

MBXAX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to CGFIX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBXAX dropped -31.75% vs CGFIX's -20.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MBXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.