PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBSD vs. GSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBSD vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBSD achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MBSD has underperformed GSG with an annualized return of 1.37%, while GSG has yielded a comparatively higher 7.69% annualized return.


MBSD

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.52%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.37%

GSG

1D
0.77%
1M
-4.83%
YTD
42.58%
6M
41.06%
1Y
51.52%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
7.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBSD vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
0.42%7.12%2.30%4.46%-9.49%-1.40%5.43%6.05%0.32%0.86%
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
42.58%5.93%8.52%-5.51%24.08%38.77%-23.94%15.62%-13.88%3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between MBSD and GSG is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

-0.06

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between MBSD and GSG has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.34, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBSD vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBSD
MBSD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MBSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GSG
GSG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBSD vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBSDGSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.40

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

5.47

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

14.39

-6.68

MBSD vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBSD Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBSD and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBSDGSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.26

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.70

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.35

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

-0.09

+0.46

Drawdowns

MBSD vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBSD drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBSD and GSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBSDGSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-89.62%

+75.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-9.46%

+7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.68%

-14.94%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.10%

-29.12%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.36%

-57.64%

+43.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-56.95%

+55.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-63.71%

+60.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

3.59%

-2.91%

Volatility

MBSD vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund (MBSD) is 1.15%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that MBSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBSDGSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

7.65%

-6.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.47%

20.42%

-17.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

22.95%

-19.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

22.61%

-17.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.26%

22.03%

-17.77%

MBSD vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBSD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBSD vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

MBSD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSG
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MBSD
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
4.19%4.23%3.91%3.39%3.03%2.41%2.78%3.42%3.22%3.30%3.02%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBSD and GSG have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to MBSD (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBSD dropped -14.36% vs GSG's -89.62%.

On 10-year performance, GSG leads with 7.69% vs 1.37% for MBSD. On fees, MBSD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, MBSD has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GSG has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 1.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MBSD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.

MBSD has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

MBSD is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while GSG is Commodities. MBSD tracks ICE BofA Constrained Duration US Mortgage Backed Securities, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for MBSD and 0.75% for GSG.

GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBSD and GSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer