PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBNE vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBNE vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBNE achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 25.39% return.


MBNE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.73%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
10Y*

XLK

1D
-6.66%
1M
6.04%
YTD
25.39%
6M
23.33%
1Y
53.58%
3Y*
30.43%
5Y*
21.75%
10Y*
24.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBNE vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
0.84%2.45%1.27%5.82%-0.71%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
25.39%24.61%21.63%56.02%-20.65%

Correlation

The correlation between MBNE and XLK is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2022

0.13

The correlation between MBNE and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBNE vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBNE
MBNE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MBNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBNE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
MBNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBNE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBNE vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBNEXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.38

-1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

11.25

-4.08

MBNE vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBNE Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBNE and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBNEXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.45

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.40

+0.22

Drawdowns

MBNE vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBNE drawdown since its inception was -6.19%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBNE and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBNEXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-82.05%

+75.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-15.92%

+13.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

-25.66%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-9.04%

+8.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-34.95%

+33.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

4.78%

-4.12%

Volatility

MBNE vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) is 0.25%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.28%. This indicates that MBNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBNEXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.25%

10.28%

-10.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

18.21%

-16.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83%

21.96%

-19.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

25.07%

-21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

24.59%

-20.90%

MBNE vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBNE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBNE vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

MBNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than XLK's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
3.15%3.63%3.32%3.01%1.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.42%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBNE and XLK have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.28%) compared to MBNE (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBNE dropped -6.19% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 3-year performance, XLK leads with 30.43% vs 2.92% for MBNE. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MBNE has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XLK has performed better with a 30.43% return vs 2.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for MBNE.

MBNE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.

MBNE is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while XLK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for MBNE and 0.08% for XLK.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBNE and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer