MBND vs. HYMB
MBND (SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF) and HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from State Street. MBND is actively managed, while HYMB is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MBND returned 0.64%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for HYMB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MBND charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for HYMB.
Performance
MBND vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MBND achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 3.07% return.
MBND
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 5.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
HYMB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 3.07%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 7.38%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
MBND vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF | 1.19% | 2.90% | 2.75% | 5.62% | -8.61% | 0.59% |
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 3.07% | 2.04% | 5.52% | 7.73% | -15.54% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBND and HYMB is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.66 |
The correlation between MBND and HYMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBND vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank
MBND
HYMB
MBND vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MBND | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.37 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 2.39 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 8.46 | -1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBND | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 1.83 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.07 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.45 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
MBND vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBND drawdown since its inception was -13.18%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBND and HYMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBND | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.18% | -29.57% | +16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -3.11% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.57% | -7.44% | +2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.18% | -20.15% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -3.80% | -0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.74% | 0.88% | -0.14% |
Volatility
MBND vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF (MBND) is 1.05%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that MBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBND | HYMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 1.35% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.81% | 3.14% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50% | 4.06% | -1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.48% | 6.66% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.41% | 11.35% | -7.94% |
MBND vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBND vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison
MBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.55% | 4.29% | 4.07% | 3.77% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.95% | 4.03% | 3.78% | 4.08% | 4.54% |
MBND SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ETF | 3.49% | 3.43% | 2.72% | 2.53% | 1.61% | 1.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBND and HYMB have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to MBND (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBND dropped -13.18% vs HYMB's -29.57%.
On 5-year performance, MBND leads with 0.64% vs 0.46% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MBND has performed better with a 0.64% return vs 0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MBND.
HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.49% for MBND.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MBND and 0.35% for HYMB.
MBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MBND and HYMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer