MBBA vs. FLSP
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and FLSP (Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while FLSP is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FLSP.
Performance
MBBA vs. FLSP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLSP
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
MBBA vs. FLSP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.72% |
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and FLSP is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2026 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. FLSP — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLSP
MBBA vs. FLSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF (FLSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MBBA | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.37 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. FLSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum FLSP drawdown of -22.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and FLSP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -22.75% | +19.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.27% | -0.68% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -6.20% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. FLSP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | FLSP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.60% | 8.79% | -4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 13.37% | -8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.60% | 13.44% | -8.84% |
MBBA vs. FLSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FLSP's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBA vs. FLSP - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than FLSP's 2.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLSP Franklin Liberty Systematic Style Premia ETF | 2.58% | 2.65% | 1.18% | 1.19% | 2.18% | 1.19% | 8.08% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and FLSP have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FLSP.
FLSP has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.21% for MBBA.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while FLSP is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.65% for FLSP.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and FLSP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer