MBBA vs. DIG
MBBA (iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF) and DIG (ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas) are both exchange-traded funds - MBBA is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund actively managed by iShares, while DIG is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Index (200%). MBBA is actively managed, while DIG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. MBBA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for DIG.
Performance
MBBA vs. DIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MBBA
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIG
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 66.35%
- 6M
- 59.45%
- 1Y
- 90.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.29%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
MBBA vs. DIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 0.64% |
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 38.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between MBBA and DIG is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2026 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MBBA vs. DIG — Risk / Return Rank
MBBA
DIG
MBBA vs. DIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF (MBBA) and ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas (DIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MBBA | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | -0.00 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
MBBA vs. DIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MBBA drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum DIG drawdown of -97.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBBA and DIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MBBA | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -97.04% | +94.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -51.27% | +50.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -64.37% | +63.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.49% | — |
Volatility
MBBA vs. DIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MBBA | DIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.66% | 40.88% | -36.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 51.59% | -46.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.66% | 57.81% | -53.15% |
MBBA vs. DIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MBBA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DIG's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
MBBA vs. DIG - Dividend Comparison
MBBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than DIG's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIG ProShares Ultra Oil & Gas | 1.50% | 2.62% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 1.33% | 2.24% | 3.18% | 2.72% | 2.30% | 1.76% | 1.09% | 1.56% |
MBBA iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MBBA and DIG have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MBBA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MBBA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DIG.
MBBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.50% for DIG.
MBBA is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while DIG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for MBBA and 0.95% for DIG.
Find the right allocation for MBBA and DIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer