PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MBAIX vs. GRSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MBAIX achieves a 4.97% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 21.59% return. Over the past 10 years, MBAIX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of 7.45%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


MBAIX

1D
0.15%
1M
1.14%
YTD
4.97%
6M
5.53%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.53%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
7.45%

GRSPX

1D
1.23%
1M
3.34%
YTD
21.59%
6M
20.73%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
18.01%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MBAIX
MainStay Balanced Fund
4.97%11.38%7.59%7.56%-5.80%17.13%7.73%19.28%-7.53%9.87%
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
21.59%6.12%16.03%11.95%-8.62%26.89%3.81%20.84%-10.21%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between MBAIX and GRSPX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

0.77

The correlation between MBAIX and GRSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MBAIX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MBAIX
MBAIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MBAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MBAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

GRSPX
GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MBAIXGRSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.99

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.37

12.80

-0.43

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MBAIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MBAIX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MBAIXGRSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.04

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.70

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.68

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.70

+0.10

Drawdowns

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MBAIX drawdown since its inception was -39.74%, which is greater than GRSPX's maximum drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MBAIX and GRSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MBAIXGRSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.74%

-35.67%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.69%

-7.97%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.37%

-19.33%

+10.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.19%

-19.33%

+6.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.87%

-35.07%

+9.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-4.81%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

2.39%

-1.23%

Volatility

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MainStay Balanced Fund (MBAIX) is 1.59%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 5.49%. This indicates that MBAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MBAIXGRSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

5.49%

-3.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.17%

11.74%

-6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.87%

15.60%

-8.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

15.57%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.61%

15.36%

-4.75%

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MBAIX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

MBAIX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

MBAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.63%, less than GRSPX's 7.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRSPX
Greenspring Fund
7.73%9.40%7.14%6.84%8.04%7.69%2.39%7.89%11.05%9.63%6.81%5.34%
MBAIX
MainStay Balanced Fund
6.63%6.95%6.14%2.27%1.86%23.51%2.24%6.04%9.37%7.05%2.94%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


MBAIX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRSPX has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to MBAIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MBAIX dropped -39.74% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

MBAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MBAIX and GRSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer