MAYZ vs. MSOO
MAYZ (TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF) and MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. MAYZ is passively managed, while MSOO is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAYZ charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MSOO.
Performance
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAYZ achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly higher than MSOO's -23.81% return.
MAYZ
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 8.43%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 16.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
MSOO
- 1D
- -6.75%
- 1M
- -28.26%
- YTD
- -23.81%
- 6M
- -38.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 8.56% | 4.92% |
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | -23.81% | -60.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAYZ and MSOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAYZ vs. MSOO — Risk / Return Rank
MAYZ
MSOO
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF (MAYZ) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAYZ | MSOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAYZ | MSOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | -1.13 | +1.93 |
Drawdowns
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAYZ drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum MSOO drawdown of -72.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYZ and MSOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAYZ | MSOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.23% | -72.39% | +53.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -70.12% | +69.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.77% | -47.41% | +42.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | — | — |
Volatility
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAYZ | MSOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.37% | 69.25% | -58.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.07% | 69.25% | -57.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 69.25% | -57.21% |
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAYZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAYZ vs. MSOO - Dividend Comparison
MAYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than MSOO's 2.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAYZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (May) ETF | 1.98% | 2.15% | 1.95% | 2.75% | 0.69% | 1.90% |
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | 2.13% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAYZ and MSOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSOO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSOO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MAYZ.
MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 1.98% for MAYZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MAYZ and 0.78% for MSOO.
Find the right allocation for MAYZ and MSOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer