PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYW vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYW vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF (MAYW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYW achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.07% return.


MAYW

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.61%
YTD
3.65%
6M
4.37%
1Y
9.70%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.64%
YTD
19.07%
6M
19.11%
1Y
36.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYW vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MAYW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF
3.65%10.24%12.08%3.75%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
19.07%14.96%7.70%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYW and QQQY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.74

The correlation between MAYW and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYW vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYW
MAYW Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYW Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYW Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYW vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF (MAYW) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAYWQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.49

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.95

3.28

+3.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.77

13.95

+22.81

MAYW vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYW Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYW and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAYWQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

2.68

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

1.25

+0.46

Drawdowns

MAYW vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYW drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYW and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYWQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-19.05%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-11.14%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.36%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.41%

-2.91%

+2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

2.61%

-2.35%

Volatility

MAYW vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF (MAYW) is 1.03%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that MAYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYWQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

4.21%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

11.30%

-9.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

13.67%

-10.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

14.75%

-8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.53%

14.75%

-8.22%

MAYW vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAYW vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

MAYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.34%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAYW
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.34%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYW and QQQY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to MAYW (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYW dropped -7.93% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 36.38% vs 9.70% for MAYW. On fees, MAYW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, MAYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAYW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.34%, compared with 0.00% for MAYW.

MAYW is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MAYW and 0.99% for QQQY.

MAYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYW and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer