MAYW vs. COMT
MAYW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, MAYW returned 10.99%/yr vs 16.18%/yr for COMT. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAYW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
MAYW vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAYW achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.
MAYW
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 3.65%
- 6M
- 4.37%
- 1Y
- 9.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
MAYW vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAYW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF | 3.65% | 10.24% | 12.08% | 8.18% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAYW and COMT is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2023 | 0.01 |
The correlation between MAYW and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MAYW vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MAYW
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
MAYW
COMT
-
Financial Services
MAYW
COMT
Communication Services
MAYW
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
MAYW
COMT
-
Healthcare
MAYW
COMT
-
Industrials
MAYW
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
MAYW
COMT
-
Energy
MAYW
COMT
-
Utilities
MAYW
COMT
-
Real Estate
MAYW
COMT
-
Basic Materials
MAYW
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAYW vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
MAYW
COMT
MAYW vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF (MAYW) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAYW | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.72 | 1.38 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.95 | 5.70 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.77 | 13.42 | +23.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAYW | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.29 | 2.14 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 0.20 | +1.51 |
Drawdowns
MAYW vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAYW drawdown since its inception was -7.93%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYW and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAYW | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.93% | -51.89% | +43.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.40% | -8.02% | +6.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.93% | -13.31% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -6.30% | +6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.41% | -24.06% | +23.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 3.40% | -3.14% |
Volatility
MAYW vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF (MAYW) is 1.03%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that MAYW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAYW | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 7.46% | -6.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 18.88% | -16.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97% | 21.36% | -18.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 21.07% | -14.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.53% | 18.89% | -12.36% |
MAYW vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAYW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAYW vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
MAYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
MAYW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 May ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAYW and COMT have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to MAYW (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYW dropped -7.93% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, COMT leads with 16.18% vs 10.99% for MAYW. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, MAYW has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, COMT has performed better with a 16.18% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MAYW.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 0.00% for MAYW.
MAYW is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MAYW and 0.48% for COMT.
MAYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAYW and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer