PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYU vs. ZAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYU achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than ZAPR's 2.99% return.


MAYU

1D
-1.98%
1M
0.51%
YTD
7.51%
6M
7.11%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZAPR

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.99%
6M
3.39%
1Y
6.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MAYU and ZAPR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.66

The correlation between MAYU and ZAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYU vs. ZAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYU
MAYU Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
MAYU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAPR
ZAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAYUZAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

2.21

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

17.30

-14.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.48

87.14

-76.66

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYU Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the ZAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYU and ZAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAYUZAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

4.66

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

2.84

-1.63

Drawdowns

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYU drawdown since its inception was -15.37%, which is greater than ZAPR's maximum drawdown of -1.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYU and ZAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYUZAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.37%

-1.72%

-13.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.14%

-0.40%

-8.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.17%

-0.28%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-0.09%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

0.08%

+1.96%

Volatility

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped May ETF (MAYU) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) at 0.48%. This indicates that MAYU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYUZAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

0.48%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

1.05%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

1.49%

+9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

2.52%

+10.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

2.52%

+10.47%

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ZAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAYU vs. ZAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYU nor ZAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYU and ZAPR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAYU has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to ZAPR (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYU dropped -15.37% vs ZAPR's -1.72%.

On 1-year performance, MAYU leads with 21.29% vs 6.92% for ZAPR. On fees, MAYU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, ZAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MAYU has performed better with a 21.29% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAYU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.

MAYU and ZAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MAYU and 0.79% for ZAPR.

ZAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.66 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYU and ZAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer