PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAYP vs. AGMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAYP vs. AGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May (MAYP) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYP achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than AGMI's 7.60% return.


MAYP

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.55%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.93%
1Y
13.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGMI

1D
-4.74%
1M
3.77%
YTD
7.60%
6M
20.09%
1Y
112.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYP vs. AGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAYP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May
5.01%10.99%10.14%
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
7.60%176.11%-0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYP and AGMI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAYP vs. AGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYP
MAYP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
MAYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAYP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MAYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAYP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AGMI
AGMI Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYP vs. AGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May (MAYP) and Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAYPAGMIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.35

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.34

3.41

+2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.59

9.21

+27.38

MAYP vs. AGMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYP Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the AGMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYP and AGMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAYPAGMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

2.32

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.46

1.56

-0.10

Drawdowns

MAYP vs. AGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYP drawdown since its inception was -11.06%, smaller than the maximum AGMI drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYP and AGMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAYPAGMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.06%

-33.26%

+22.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.11%

-33.26%

+31.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-22.35%

+22.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.65%

-9.14%

+8.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

12.29%

-11.93%

Volatility

MAYP vs. AGMI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May (MAYP) is 1.71%, while Themes Silver Miners ETF (AGMI) has a volatility of 17.62%. This indicates that MAYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAYPAGMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.71%

17.62%

-15.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.52%

40.98%

-37.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.51%

48.95%

-44.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

44.04%

-34.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

44.04%

-34.79%

MAYP vs. AGMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AGMI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAYP vs. AGMI - Dividend Comparison

MAYP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.


PositionTTM20252024
AGMI
Themes Silver Miners ETF
4.12%4.43%1.81%
MAYP
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAYP and AGMI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGMI has higher volatility (17.62%) compared to MAYP (1.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYP dropped -11.06% vs AGMI's -33.26%.

On 1-year performance, AGMI leads with 112.77% vs 13.30% for MAYP. On fees, AGMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MAYP has been the lower-risk option at 1.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AGMI has performed better with a 112.77% return vs 13.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MAYP.

AGMI has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for MAYP.

MAYP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while AGMI is Silver. They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MAYP and 0.35% for AGMI.

MAYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAYP and AGMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer