MAYM vs. SPLV
MAYM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. MAYM is actively managed, while SPLV is passively managed. Over the past year, MAYM returned 6.36% vs -0.03% for SPLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAYM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.
Performance
MAYM vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAYM achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 1.32% return.
MAYM
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 6M
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 6.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPLV
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- -0.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 8.01%
MAYM vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MAYM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May | 2.33% | 4.07% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 1.32% | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between MAYM and SPLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MAYM vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
MAYM
SPLV
MAYM vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MAYM | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.91 | 1.01 | +0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | -0.00 | +5.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.95 | -0.01 | +36.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MAYM | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | -0.00 | +3.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.36 | 0.68 | +2.68 |
Drawdowns
MAYM vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAYM drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, smaller than the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYM and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MAYM | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.22% | -36.26% | +35.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.22% | -7.41% | +6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -6.91% | +6.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -3.55% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.17% | 3.05% | -2.88% |
Volatility
MAYM vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) is 0.34%, while Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) has a volatility of 2.97%. This indicates that MAYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MAYM | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.34% | 2.97% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.49% | 6.78% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85% | 9.78% | -7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.87% | 12.45% | -10.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.87% | 15.36% | -13.49% |
MAYM vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAYM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MAYM vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
MAYM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAYM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.22% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MAYM and SPLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to MAYM (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYM dropped -1.22% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 1-year performance, MAYM leads with 6.36% vs -0.03% for SPLV. On fees, SPLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, MAYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MAYM has performed better with a 6.36% return vs -0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MAYM.
SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for MAYM.
MAYM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SPLV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MAYM and 0.25% for SPLV.
MAYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MAYM and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer