MAYM vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MAYM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - MAYM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by First Trust, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MAYM returned 6.36% vs 23.38% for QMAR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MAYM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

MAYM vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAYM achieves a 2.33% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 13.06% return.

MAYM

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.33%
• 6M: 2.86%
• 1Y: 6.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.81%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.01%
• 1Y: 23.38%
• 3Y*: 16.73%
• 5Y*: 12.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAYM vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAYM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May	2.33%	4.07%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	13.06%	10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between MAYM and QMAR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2025	0.77

The correlation between MAYM and QMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MAYM vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAYM

MAYM Risk / Return Rank: 94
MAYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
MAYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
MAYM Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MAYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
MAYM Martin Ratio Rank: 96

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 96
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAYM vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAYM	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.47	3.86	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.78	6.05	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.91	1.93	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.25	7.31	-2.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	36.95	52.66	-15.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAYM vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAYM Sharpe Ratio is 3.47, which is comparable to the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAYM and QMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAYM	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47	3.86	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.36	0.91	+2.45

Drawdowns

MAYM vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAYM drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAYM and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAYM	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.22%	-19.83%	+18.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.22%	-3.21%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.19%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-3.28%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.17%	0.45%	-0.28%

Volatility

MAYM vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - May (MAYM) is 0.34%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that MAYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAYM	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.34%	1.27%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.49%	4.85%	-3.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.85%	6.09%	-4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.87%	13.97%	-12.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.87%	13.85%	-11.98%

MAYM vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAYM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAYM vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither MAYM nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAYM and QMAR in my portfolio?

MAYM and QMAR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAYM or QMAR?

QMAR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to MAYM (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAYM dropped -1.22% vs QMAR's -19.83%.

Which ETF is better, MAYM or QMAR?

On 1-year performance, QMAR leads with 23.38% vs 6.36% for MAYM. On fees, MAYM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, MAYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAYM or QMAR?

Over the 1-year period, QMAR has performed better with a 23.38% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAYM or QMAR?

MAYM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAYM or QMAR?

MAYM and QMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MAYM and QMAR?

MAYM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MAYM and 0.90% for QMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 3.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.