PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAXJ vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAXJ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAXJ achieves a 3.14% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


MAXJ

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.48%
YTD
3.14%
6M
3.08%
1Y
8.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAXJ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
3.14%8.97%4.56%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between MAXJ and SLV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAXJ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAXJ
MAXJ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MAXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MAXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAXJ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MAXJSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.79

1.25

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.92

1.47

+3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.96

3.16

+25.80

MAXJ vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAXJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.46, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAXJ and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MAXJ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAXJ drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAXJ and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAXJSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-76.28%

+69.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-47.23%

+45.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-47.23%

+47.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.55%

-44.65%

+44.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

21.91%

-21.62%

Volatility

MAXJ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF (MAXJ) is 0.30%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that MAXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAXJSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

14.34%

-14.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

59.27%

-57.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

60.33%

-57.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.21%

36.59%

-31.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

32.09%

-26.88%

MAXJ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAXJ and SLV have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MAXJ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

MAXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
MAXJ
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Jun ETF
0.98%1.01%0.81%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAXJ and SLV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to MAXJ (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAXJ dropped -6.35% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 1-year performance, SLV leads with 69.08% vs 8.35% for MAXJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, MAXJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLV has performed better with a 69.08% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MAXJ and SLV have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MAXJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

MAXJ is categorized as Equity Hedged, while SLV is Silver.

MAXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAXJ and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer