MAVF vs. GSG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MAVF (Matrix Advisors Value ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MAVF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Matrix Asset Advisors, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. MAVF is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, MAVF returned 26.51% vs 34.57% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

MAVF vs. GSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAVF achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 32.35% return.

MAVF

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 1.76%
• 6M: 8.38%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 1Y: 26.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GSG

• 1D: 3.60%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 28.24%
• YTD: 32.35%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 13.83%
• 10Y*: 7.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAVF vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MAVF Matrix Advisors Value ETF	12.50%	18.40%
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	32.35%	1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MAVF and GSG is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025	-0.08

The correlation between MAVF and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MAVF vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAVF

MAVF Risk / Return Rank: 69
MAVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MAVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
MAVF Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MAVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MAVF Martin Ratio Rank: 68

GSG

GSG Risk / Return Rank: 51
GSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GSG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GSG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAVF vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAVF	GSG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.48	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.06	+0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.27	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.85	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.76	6.29	+3.46

MAVF vs. GSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAVF Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the GSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAVF and GSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAVF vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAVF drawdown since its inception was -17.13%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAVF and GSG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAVF	GSG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.13%	-89.62%	+72.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-18.81%	+7.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.81%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.12%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-60.04%	+59.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-63.69%	+61.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	5.51%	-2.79%

Volatility

MAVF vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is 4.11%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that MAVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAVF	GSG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.11%	7.35%	-3.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.30%	21.50%	-10.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	23.48%	-9.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.94%	22.80%	-3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.94%	22.00%	-3.06%

MAVF vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MAVF and GSG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

MAVF vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison

MAVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust	0.00%	0.00%
MAVF Matrix Advisors Value ETF	0.38%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAVF and GSG in my portfolio?

MAVF and GSG have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAVF or GSG?

GSG has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to MAVF (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAVF dropped -17.13% vs GSG's -89.62%.

Which ETF is better, MAVF or GSG?

On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 34.57% vs 26.51% for MAVF. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, MAVF has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAVF or GSG?

Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 34.57% return vs 26.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAVF or GSG?

MAVF and GSG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAVF or GSG?

MAVF has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.

What is the main difference between MAVF and GSG?

MAVF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Matrix Asset Advisors and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAVF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.