PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (MASPTOP50.NS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASPTOP50.NS achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 21.07% return.


MASPTOP50.NS

1D
-1.92%
1M
-2.96%
6M
6.26%
YTD
5.70%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
31.80%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
22.29%

SPMO

1D
0.29%
1M
-4.64%
6M
20.51%
YTD
21.07%
1Y
28.09%
3Y*
37.36%
5Y*
20.21%
10Y*
19.57%
ALL TIME*
18.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.66M$8.68M$11.93M
$331.54M$346.70M$350.59M

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MASPTOP50.NS
Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
5.70%22.47%65.09%36.63%-15.84%7.80%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
21.07%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2021

0.09

The correlation between MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MASPTOP50.NS
MASPTOP50.NS Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MASPTOP50.NS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASPTOP50.NS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASPTOP50.NS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MASPTOP50.NS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASPTOP50.NS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (MASPTOP50.NS) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MASPTOP50.NSSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.21

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.37

1.63

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.38

5.93

+0.45

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASPTOP50.NS Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASPTOP50.NS drawdown since its inception was -29.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASPTOP50.NSSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-30.95%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-15.64%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.85%

-20.13%

-9.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

-11.03%

+2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.81%

-4.62%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

4.29%

-1.06%

Volatility

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (MASPTOP50.NS) is 4.06%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that MASPTOP50.NS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASPTOP50.NSSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.06%

10.53%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

21.52%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

23.90%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

20.60%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

20.92%

+1.53%

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASPTOP50.NS has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASPTOP50.NS vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

MASPTOP50.NS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASPTOP50.NS
Mirae Asset S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.73%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for MASPTOP50.NS.

MASPTOP50.NS is categorized as S&P 500, while SPMO is Momentum. MASPTOP50.NS tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Total Return Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Mirae Asset and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for MASPTOP50.NS and 0.13% for SPMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASPTOP50.NS and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer