PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASKX vs. BSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASKX achieves a 18.62% return, which is significantly higher than BSPGX's 11.70% return.


MASKX

1D
0.89%
1M
4.97%
YTD
18.62%
6M
17.33%
1Y
41.04%
3Y*
18.52%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
11.12%

BSPGX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.73%
1Y
28.95%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
18.62%12.76%11.35%16.99%-20.39%14.54%19.99%7.78%
BSPGX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G
11.70%17.85%24.96%26.27%-18.12%28.66%19.16%11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MASKX and BSPGX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2019

0.81

The correlation between MASKX and BSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASKX vs. BSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MASKX
MASKX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
MASKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
MASKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BSPGX
BSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
BSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MASKXBSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.46

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

3.35

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

15.67

-1.64

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the BSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASKX and BSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MASKXBSPGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.52

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.85

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.83

-0.47

Drawdowns

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASKX drawdown since its inception was -59.06%, which is greater than BSPGX's maximum drawdown of -33.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASKX and BSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASKXBSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.06%

-33.74%

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.01%

-8.90%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.53%

-18.73%

-8.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-24.50%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.63%

-5.09%

-6.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.90%

+1.19%

Volatility

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund (MASKX) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G (BSPGX) at 2.82%. This indicates that MASKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASKXBSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

2.82%

+2.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

8.97%

+4.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

11.85%

+7.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.16%

16.88%

+6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.70%

20.01%

+3.69%

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASKX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than BSPGX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MASKX vs. BSPGX - Dividend Comparison

MASKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than BSPGX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSPGX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class G
1.58%1.74%1.43%1.52%2.04%1.83%2.09%2.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MASKX
iShares Russell 2000 Small-Cap Index Fund
2.64%3.13%4.81%2.92%1.70%7.64%1.42%3.43%4.26%3.15%4.60%3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASKX and BSPGX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASKX has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to BSPGX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASKX dropped -59.06% vs BSPGX's -33.74%.

BSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASKX and BSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer