PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARZ vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MARZ vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MARZ vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
-3.87%12.90%9.96%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
-2.37%14.01%10.13%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's -2.37% return.


MARZ

1D
2.10%
1M
-3.81%
YTD
-3.87%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
12.98%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*

FBUF

1D
1.51%
1M
-3.11%
YTD
-2.37%
6M
0.90%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MARZ vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MARZ vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARZ
MARZ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MARZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MARZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARZ vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARZFBUFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

1.33

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.32

1.87

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.30

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.16

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

9.34

-3.44

MARZ vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARZ and FBUF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARZFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.33

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.11

-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MARZ and FBUF is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

MARZ vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than FBUF's 0.67% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
MARZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF
3.43%3.30%4.55%7.33%0.78%2.43%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.67%0.64%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MARZ vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and FBUF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MARZFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.89%

-11.09%

-7.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-6.81%

-2.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-4.18%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-1.42%

-2.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.58%

+0.54%

Volatility

MARZ vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 3.11%. This indicates that MARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MARZFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

3.11%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.91%

6.52%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

10.77%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

9.87%

+2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.30%

9.87%

+2.43%