MARZ vs. FBUF
Compare and contrast key facts about TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF).
MARZ and FBUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MARZ is a passively managed fund by TrueShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Price Index. It was launched on Feb 26, 2021. FBUF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 9, 2024.
Performance
MARZ vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MARZ vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | -3.87% | 12.90% | 9.96% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | -2.37% | 14.01% | 10.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARZ achieves a -3.87% return, which is significantly lower than FBUF's -2.37% return.
MARZ
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.87%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 12.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.93%
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MARZ vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MARZ vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
MARZ
FBUF
MARZ vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARZ | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.86 | 1.33 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.87 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 2.16 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.89 | 9.34 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARZ | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 1.33 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.11 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between MARZ and FBUF is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MARZ vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
MARZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than FBUF's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARZ TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF | 3.43% | 3.30% | 4.55% | 7.33% | 0.78% | 2.43% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MARZ vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARZ drawdown since its inception was -18.89%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARZ and FBUF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARZ | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.89% | -11.09% | -7.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.46% | -6.81% | -2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.51% | -4.18% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -1.42% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.58% | +0.54% |
Volatility
MARZ vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
TrueShares Structured Outcome (March) ETF (MARZ) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) at 3.11%. This indicates that MARZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MARZ | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.11% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 6.52% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 10.77% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 9.87% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.30% | 9.87% | +2.43% |