MARW vs. APRD
MARW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF) and APRD (Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. MARW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRD.
Performance
MARW vs. APRD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARW
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- 12.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARW vs. APRD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF | 4.23% |
APRD Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April | 0.00% |
MARW vs. APRD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MARW
APRD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MARW
APRD
Financial Services
MARW
APRD
Communication Services
MARW
APRD
Consumer Cyclical
MARW
APRD
Healthcare
MARW
APRD
Industrials
MARW
APRD
Consumer Defensive
MARW
APRD
Energy
MARW
APRD
Utilities
MARW
APRD
Real Estate
MARW
APRD
Basic Materials
MARW
APRD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARW vs. APRD — Risk / Return Rank
MARW
APRD
MARW vs. APRD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Mar ETF (MARW) and Innovator Premium Income 10 Barrier ETF - April (APRD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.97 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MARW vs. APRD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARW drawdown since its inception was -7.58%, which is greater than APRD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARW and APRD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | 0.00% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility
MARW vs. APRD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARW | APRD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 0.00% | +4.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 0.00% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 0.00% | +6.10% |
MARW vs. APRD - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than APRD's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARW vs. APRD - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARW nor APRD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MARW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MARW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRD.
MARW and APRD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MARW and 0.79% for APRD.
Find the right allocation for MARW and APRD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer