MARS vs. PSCI
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and PSCI (Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PSCI is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Industrials Index. MARS is actively managed, while PSCI is passively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PSCI.
Performance
MARS vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- -30.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCI
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 20.68%
- 6M
- 17.35%
- 1Y
- 41.01%
- 3Y*
- 23.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.00%
MARS vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 12.68% |
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 8.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and PSCI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCI
MARS vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum PSCI drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and PSCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -45.55% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.03% | -0.15% | -36.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -6.89% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.37% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | PSCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.92% | 21.44% | +46.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 23.00% | +44.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 25.25% | +42.67% |
MARS vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSCI Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF | 1.31% | 1.56% | 0.65% | 0.72% | 0.87% | 0.69% | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and PSCI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSCI is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.29% for PSCI.
Find the right allocation for MARS and PSCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer