PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARS vs. PSCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARS vs. PSCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MARS

1D
3.41%
1M
25.54%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSCI

1D
1.04%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
14.90%
6M
14.78%
1Y
36.71%
3Y*
22.55%
5Y*
13.60%
10Y*
14.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARS vs. PSCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MARS and PSCI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARS vs. PSCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARS

PSCI
PSCI Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARS vs. PSCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF (PSCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MARS vs. PSCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARSPSCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.25

0.57

+6.68

Drawdowns

MARS vs. PSCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, smaller than the maximum PSCI drawdown of -45.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and PSCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARSPSCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-45.55%

+26.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.76%

-1.90%

-14.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-6.91%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

Volatility

MARS vs. PSCI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARSPSCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.61%

20.98%

+41.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.61%

23.02%

+39.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.61%

25.25%

+37.36%

MARS vs. PSCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PSCI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARS vs. PSCI - Dividend Comparison

MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSCI
Invesco S&P SmallCap Industrials ETF
1.38%1.56%0.65%0.72%0.87%0.69%0.59%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.74%1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARS and PSCI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSCI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.

PSCI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.

MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSCI is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.29% for PSCI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARS and PSCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer