MARS vs. FIDU
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and FIDU (Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while FIDU is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Industrials Index. MARS is actively managed, while FIDU is passively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FIDU.
Performance
MARS vs. FIDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -4.74%
- 1M
- -30.38%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIDU
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 28.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
MARS vs. FIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 12.68% |
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 3.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and FIDU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. FIDU — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FIDU
MARS vs. FIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF (FIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. FIDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -37.03%, smaller than the maximum FIDU drawdown of -42.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and FIDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.03% | -42.31% | +5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.03% | -1.16% | -35.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.70% | -4.79% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. FIDU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | FIDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.92% | 17.37% | +50.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 18.40% | +49.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.92% | 20.34% | +47.58% |
MARS vs. FIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FIDU's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. FIDU - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDU Fidelity MSCI Industrials Index ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.42% | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.12% | 1.28% | 1.73% | 1.99% | 1.60% | 1.63% | 1.98% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and FIDU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FIDU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FIDU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
FIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.93%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while FIDU is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.08% for FIDU.
Find the right allocation for MARS and FIDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer