MARS vs. DTCR
MARS (Roundhill Space & Technology ETF) and DTCR (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DTCR is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. MARS is actively managed, while DTCR is passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTCR.
Performance
MARS vs. DTCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MARS
- 1D
- -5.56%
- 1M
- -26.71%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DTCR
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- 6M
- 17.67%
- YTD
- 31.00%
- 1Y
- 45.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.41%
- 10Y*
- —
MARS vs. DTCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | -2.67% |
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARS and DTCR is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARS vs. DTCR — Risk / Return Rank
MARS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DTCR
MARS vs. DTCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Space & Technology ETF (MARS) and Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF (DTCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MARS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MARS vs. DTCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARS drawdown since its inception was -45.60%, which is greater than DTCR's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARS and DTCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.60% | -38.98% | -6.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.60% | -14.84% | -30.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.45% | -12.25% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.89% | — |
Volatility
MARS vs. DTCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARS | DTCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.30% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.55% | 24.04% | +43.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 22.36% | +45.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.55% | 22.18% | +45.37% |
MARS vs. DTCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DTCR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARS vs. DTCR - Dividend Comparison
MARS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DTCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTCR Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% |
MARS Roundhill Space & Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARS and DTCR have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DTCR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DTCR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MARS.
DTCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for MARS.
MARS is categorized as Technology Equities, while DTCR is REIT. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MARS and 0.50% for DTCR.
Find the right allocation for MARS and DTCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer