PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARO vs. USCL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MARO
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
-13.08%-48.05%-19.61%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
-6.74%15.30%-1.25%
Different Trading Currencies

MARO is traded in USD, while USCL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the USCL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than USCL.TO's -6.74% return.


MARO

1D
3.69%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
-13.08%
6M
-53.43%
1Y
-33.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

USCL.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.04%
YTD
-6.74%
6M
-3.56%
1Y
12.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MARO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MARO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARO
MARO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

USCL.TO
USCL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAROUSCL.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.52

0.63

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

1.05

-1.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.88

-1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

4.54

-5.67

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARO Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the USCL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARO and USCL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAROUSCL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.52

0.63

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.82

0.91

-1.73

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and USCL.TO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 279.58%, more than USCL.TO's 13.76% yield.


TTM202520242023
MARO
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
279.58%277.68%0.00%0.00%
USCL.TO
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
13.76%12.94%11.57%7.08%

Drawdowns

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than USCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and USCL.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MAROUSCL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.75%

-21.85%

-49.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.51%

-14.94%

-50.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-66.88%

-8.56%

-58.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.99%

-2.66%

-37.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.17%

3.63%

+29.54%

Volatility

MARO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a higher volatility of 20.53% compared to Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) at 5.12%. This indicates that MARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MAROUSCL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.53%

5.12%

+15.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.16%

9.22%

+40.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.75%

19.99%

+44.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.81%

15.80%

+51.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.81%

15.80%

+51.01%