MARO vs. SBIT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). MARO is actively managed, while SBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, MARO returned -37.73% vs 98.77% for SBIT. Their -0.66 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MARO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.

Performance

MARO vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a 5.71% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 39.44% return.

MARO

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: -7.33%
• 6M: 4.46%
• YTD: 5.71%
• 1Y: -37.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -41.18%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.60%
• 1M: -6.04%
• 6M: 32.41%
• YTD: 39.44%
• 1Y: 98.77%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -42.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	$1.77M	$2.35M	$3.24M
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	$29.57M	$32.71M	$46.48M

MARO vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	5.71%	-48.05%	-23.63%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	39.44%	-25.11%	1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and SBIT is -0.63, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024	-0.66

The correlation between MARO and SBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MARO vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 5
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MARO vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARO	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	1.27	-1.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.63	1.95	-2.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.23	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.61	2.35	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	5.19	-6.13

MARO vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARO Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARO and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MARO vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARO	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.75%	-91.35%	+19.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.51%	-47.94%	-17.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.72%	-77.87%	+18.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.17%	-69.07%	+25.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.97%	21.67%	+20.30%

Volatility

MARO vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a higher volatility of 26.53% compared to Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) at 18.09%. This indicates that MARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARO	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.53%	18.09%	+8.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.21%	67.10%	-14.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	65.49%	88.65%	-23.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.53%	96.10%	-29.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.53%	96.10%	-29.57%

MARO vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

MARO vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 202.73%, more than SBIT's 4.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	202.73%	277.68%	0.00%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	4.03%	0.52%	1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARO and SBIT in my portfolio?

MARO and SBIT have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MARO or SBIT?

MARO has higher volatility (26.53%) compared to SBIT (18.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARO dropped -71.75% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, MARO or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 98.77% vs -37.73% for MARO. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SBIT has been the lower-risk option at 18.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MARO or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 98.77% return vs -37.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARO or SBIT?

SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MARO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARO or SBIT?

MARO has the higher dividend yield at 202.73%, compared with 4.03% for SBIT.

What is the main difference between MARO and SBIT?

MARO is categorized as Derivative Income, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MARO and 0.95% for SBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SBIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.