MARO vs. EMAX.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO).

MARO and EMAX.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MARO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Dec 9, 2024. EMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Feb 6, 2024.

Performance

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	-13.08%	-48.05%	-19.61%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	29.64%	9.65%	-4.24%

Different Trading Currencies

MARO is traded in USD, while EMAX.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EMAX.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a -13.08% return, which is significantly lower than EMAX.TO's 29.64% return.

MARO

• 1D: 3.69%
• 1M: -8.15%
• YTD: -13.08%
• 6M: -53.43%
• 1Y: -33.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMAX.TO

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 8.93%
• YTD: 29.64%
• 6M: 31.98%
• 1Y: 34.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EMAX.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

MARO

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF

EMAX.TO

Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF

Return for Risk

MARO vs. EMAX.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 4
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 3

EMAX.TO

EMAX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 59
EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
EMAX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EMAX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EMAX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EMAX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.52	1.33	-1.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.43	1.77	-2.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.27	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.57	1.73	-2.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.13	5.68	-6.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARO Sharpe Ratio is -0.52, which is lower than the EMAX.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARO and EMAX.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.52	1.33	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.82	0.72	-1.54

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and EMAX.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 279.58%, more than EMAX.TO's 9.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	279.58%	277.68%	0.00%
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF	9.29%	13.44%	12.31%

Drawdowns

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than EMAX.TO's maximum drawdown of -30.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and EMAX.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.75%	-27.55%	-44.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.51%	-20.97%	-44.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.88%	-3.30%	-63.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.99%	-9.52%	-30.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.17%	8.03%	+25.14%

Volatility

MARO vs. EMAX.TO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a higher volatility of 20.53% compared to Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) at 5.10%. This indicates that MARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMAX.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MARO	EMAX.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.53%	5.10%	+15.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.16%	13.08%	+37.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.75%	26.40%	+38.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.81%	22.56%	+44.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.81%	22.56%	+44.25%