EMAX.TO vs. XLE
Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE).
EMAX.TO and XLE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMAX.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Feb 6, 2024. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Performance
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 31.32% | 4.63% | 3.60% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 39.78% | 2.93% | 12.89% |
Different Trading Currencies
EMAX.TO is traded in CAD, while XLE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMAX.TO achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 39.78% return.
EMAX.TO
- 1D
- -1.98%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 31.82%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 12.44%
- YTD
- 39.78%
- 6M
- 39.09%
- 1Y
- 30.81%
- 3Y*
- 18.84%
- 5Y*
- 26.57%
- 10Y*
- 12.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMAX.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMAX.TO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
EMAX.TO
XLE
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMAX.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.62 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.65 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.01 | 3.53 | +0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMAX.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.24 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.44 | +0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMAX.TO and XLE is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
EMAX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, more than XLE's 2.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMAX.TO Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF | 9.29% | 13.44% | 12.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.44% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Drawdowns
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMAX.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.55%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -62.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMAX.TO and XLE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMAX.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.55% | -71.26% | +43.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | -18.79% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.30% | -2.08% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.52% | -18.05% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.03% | 7.14% | +0.89% |
Volatility
EMAX.TO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton Energy YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (EMAX.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) have volatilities of 5.45% and 5.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMAX.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 5.52% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 13.99% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.34% | 24.92% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 24.06% | -1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 27.13% | -4.99% |