MARO vs. CHPY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY).

MARO and CHPY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MARO is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Dec 9, 2024. CHPY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Apr 2, 2025.

Performance

MARO vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MARO vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	-13.41%	-21.21%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	12.50%	62.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a -13.41% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 12.50% return.

MARO

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -13.10%
• YTD: -13.41%
• 6M: -54.21%
• 1Y: -35.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPY

• 1D: 1.79%
• 1M: -1.93%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 22.79%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARO vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARO and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

MARO

YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF

CHPY

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF

Return for Risk

MARO vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 4
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARO vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MARO	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.49	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MARO	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.82	2.59	-3.41

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and CHPY is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MARO vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 280.63%, more than CHPY's 39.01% yield.

	TTM	2025
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	280.63%	277.68%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	39.01%	28.19%

Drawdowns

MARO vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARO	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.75%	-12.17%	-59.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.00%	-4.98%	-62.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.07%	-2.16%	-37.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.38%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MARO	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.55%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	50.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.44%	32.72%	+31.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.70%	32.72%	+33.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.70%	32.72%	+33.98%