MARO vs. CBNK.TO
MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CBNK.TO (Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MARO returned -26.17% vs 76.91% for CBNK.TO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MARO is traded in USD, while CBNK.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CBNK.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a 27.88% return, which is significantly higher than CBNK.TO's 24.00% return.
MARO
- 1D
- -2.22%
- 1M
- 12.47%
- YTD
- 27.88%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- -26.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBNK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 24.00%
- 6M
- 32.69%
- 1Y
- 76.91%
- 3Y*
- 37.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 27.88% | -48.05% | -19.61% |
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 24.00% | 58.94% | -3.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARO and CBNK.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARO vs. CBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MARO
CBNK.TO
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 4.65 | -5.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | 6.09 | -6.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.77 | -0.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 7.06 | -7.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.68 | 30.68 | -31.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 4.65 | -5.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.81 | -1.35 |
Drawdowns
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than CBNK.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and CBNK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.75% | -38.51% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.51% | -10.94% | -54.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.27% | -2.92% | -48.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.97% | -14.36% | -27.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.58% | 2.51% | +36.07% |
Volatility
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF (CBNK.TO) at 5.64%. This indicates that MARO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARO | CBNK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 5.64% | +5.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.34% | 14.21% | +32.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.49% | 16.62% | +44.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.15% | 20.39% | +44.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 65.15% | 20.39% | +44.76% |
Dividends
MARO vs. CBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison
MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 183.99%, more than CBNK.TO's 5.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBNK.TO Mulvihill Canadian Bank Enhanced Yield ETF | 5.94% | 5.86% | 8.25% | 9.59% | 7.85% |
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF | 183.99% | 277.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARO and CBNK.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Mulvihill.
Find the right allocation for MARO and CBNK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer