MARO vs. ARMW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

MARO vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARO achieves a 29.91% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 297.09% return.

MARO

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 3.08%
• YTD: 29.91%
• 6M: 21.37%
• 1Y: -20.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMW

• 1D: -13.02%
• 1M: 22.00%
• YTD: 297.09%
• 6M: 286.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARO vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	29.91%	-47.36%
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	297.09%	-41.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MARO and ARMW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.43

Return for Risk

MARO vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARO

MARO Risk / Return Rank: 7
MARO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MARO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MARO Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MARO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MARO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ARMW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARO vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF (MARO) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MARO	ARMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.52	—	—

Drawdowns

MARO vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARO drawdown since its inception was -71.75%, which is greater than ARMW's maximum drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARO and ARMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MARO	ARMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.75%	-48.47%	-23.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-65.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.50%	-20.08%	-30.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.26%	-25.29%	-16.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MARO	ARMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.21%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.60%	94.74%	-32.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	65.24%	94.74%	-29.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	65.24%	94.74%	-29.50%

MARO vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MARO and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

MARO vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

MARO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 177.57%, more than ARMW's 25.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF	25.98%	16.38%
MARO YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF	177.57%	277.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MARO and ARMW in my portfolio?

MARO and ARMW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MARO or ARMW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MARO or ARMW?

MARO and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MARO or ARMW?

MARO has the higher dividend yield at 177.57%, compared with 25.98% for ARMW.

What is the main difference between MARO and ARMW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill Investments.