MARM vs. APRB
MARM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March) and APRB (Aptus April Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MARM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for APRB.
Performance
MARM vs. APRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARM achieves a 3.24% return, which is significantly lower than APRB's 4.77% return.
MARM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 3.24%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 7.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARM vs. APRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MARM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March | 3.24% | 1.40% |
APRB Aptus April Buffer ETF | 4.77% | 2.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARM and APRB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARM vs. APRB — Risk / Return Rank
MARM
APRB
MARM vs. APRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - March (MARM) and Aptus April Buffer ETF (APRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | 2.00 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
MARM vs. APRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARM drawdown since its inception was -2.74%, smaller than the maximum APRB drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARM and APRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.74% | -4.59% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.11% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -0.74% | +0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | — | — |
Volatility
MARM vs. APRB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARM | APRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60% | 5.98% | -4.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 5.98% | -2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.38% | 5.98% | -2.60% |
MARM vs. APRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than APRB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARM vs. APRB - Dividend Comparison
Neither MARM nor APRB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MARM and APRB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, APRB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
APRB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MARM.
MARM and APRB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for MARM and 0.25% for APRB.
Find the right allocation for MARM and APRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer