PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARFX vs. FVCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARFX achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 20.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MARFX has outperformed FVCSX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FVCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.66% annualized return.


MARFX

1D
1.11%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.39%
6M
12.61%
1Y
24.24%
3Y*
14.08%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
11.09%

FVCSX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.38%
YTD
20.48%
6M
22.00%
1Y
38.90%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
11.39%13.68%6.71%12.58%-4.06%26.43%7.21%29.57%-9.55%8.79%
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
20.48%7.23%-6.69%19.32%-8.35%31.94%7.10%33.09%-17.58%16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between MARFX and FVCSX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1995

0.84

The correlation between MARFX and FVCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.95 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARFX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARFX
MARFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MARFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MARFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FVCSX
FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARFXFVCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

4.20

-1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.23

15.50

-5.27

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARFX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARFXFVCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

2.45

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.31

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.44

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.29

+0.19

Drawdowns

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARFX drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, smaller than the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARFX and FVCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARFXFVCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.39%

-70.38%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.50%

-9.89%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-37.07%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.07%

-37.07%

+17.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-48.07%

+5.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-11.19%

+3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.68%

-0.17%

Volatility

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund (MARFX) is 3.18%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that MARFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARFXFVCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

4.26%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.39%

11.93%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.86%

16.99%

-4.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

21.05%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

22.19%

-3.19%

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARFX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARFX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

MARFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, less than FVCSX's 10.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVCSX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C
10.85%13.08%0.00%2.96%2.23%9.80%0.33%5.50%18.83%8.78%25.66%0.43%
MARFX
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Fund
10.17%11.33%7.46%3.70%4.50%11.16%2.13%3.95%8.41%22.19%5.43%15.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MARFX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FVCSX has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to MARFX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARFX dropped -55.39% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARFX and FVCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer