PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MARB vs. BTAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MARB vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MARB achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -19.67% return.


MARB

1D
0.05%
1M
0.22%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.42%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*

BTAL

1D
0.70%
1M
-6.55%
YTD
-19.67%
6M
-18.88%
1Y
-37.06%
3Y*
-12.64%
5Y*
-4.56%
10Y*
-4.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MARB vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
1.26%7.02%0.73%2.16%3.89%0.26%-2.35%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
-19.67%-20.17%12.83%-15.11%20.48%-6.81%-16.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MARB and BTAL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2020

-0.11

The correlation between MARB and BTAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MARB vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MARB
BTAL

Healthcare

29.7%
10.2%

Real Estate

20.0%
6.2%

Communication Services

15.2%
3.4%

Financial Services

15.0%
14.9%

Technology

14.3%
19.5%

Industrials

9.1%
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
12.8%

Basic Materials

-

4.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.6%

Energy

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Healthcare

MARB
29.7%
BTAL
10.2%

Real Estate

MARB
20.0%
BTAL
6.2%

Communication Services

MARB
15.2%
BTAL
3.4%

Financial Services

MARB
15.0%
BTAL
14.9%

Technology

MARB
14.3%
BTAL
19.5%

Industrials

MARB
9.1%
BTAL
13.7%

Consumer Cyclical

MARB
5.8%
BTAL
12.8%

Basic Materials

MARB

-

BTAL
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

MARB

-

BTAL
5.6%

Energy

MARB

-

BTAL
4.4%

Utilities

MARB

-

BTAL
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MARB vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MARB
MARB Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
MARB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MARB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MARB Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
MARB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
MARB Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BTAL
BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MARB vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MARBBTALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.72

+0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

-0.99

+3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.98

-1.72

+22.70

MARB vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MARB Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MARB and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MARBBTALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

-1.72

+2.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

-0.24

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

-0.24

+0.60

Drawdowns

MARB vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MARB drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARB and BTAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MARBBTALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.99%

-50.28%

+38.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.43%

-37.50%

+35.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.67%

-45.16%

+41.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.67%

-45.16%

+41.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.00%

-49.93%

+49.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-21.95%

+20.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

21.54%

-21.24%

Volatility

MARB vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) is 0.47%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that MARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MARBBTALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

7.54%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

15.38%

-13.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.31%

21.59%

-16.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.27%

18.75%

-14.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.60%

17.23%

-11.63%

MARB vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MARB has a 2.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

MARB vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

MARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than BTAL's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
3.10%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%
MARB
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF
2.98%3.01%2.11%2.20%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MARB and BTAL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to MARB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARB dropped -11.99% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

On 5-year performance, MARB leads with 2.64% vs -4.56% for BTAL. On fees, BTAL is cheaper at 2.11% per year. On volatility, MARB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MARB has performed better with a 2.64% return vs -4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTAL is cheaper with a 2.11% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.

BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.98% for MARB.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AGF. Their fees differ too: 2.30% for MARB and 2.11% for BTAL.

MARB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MARB and BTAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer