MARB vs. BTAL
MARB (First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF) and BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both Long-Short funds. MARB is actively managed, while BTAL is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MARB returned 2.64%/yr vs -4.56%/yr for BTAL. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. MARB charges 2.30%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for BTAL.
Performance
MARB vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARB achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -19.67% return.
MARB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BTAL
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- YTD
- -19.67%
- 6M
- -18.88%
- 1Y
- -37.06%
- 3Y*
- -12.64%
- 5Y*
- -4.56%
- 10Y*
- -4.73%
MARB vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.26% | 7.02% | 0.73% | 2.16% | 3.89% | 0.26% | -2.35% |
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | -19.67% | -20.17% | 12.83% | -15.11% | 20.48% | -6.81% | -16.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARB and BTAL is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2020 | -0.11 |
The correlation between MARB and BTAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MARB vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MARB
BTAL
Healthcare
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
MARB
BTAL
Real Estate
MARB
BTAL
Communication Services
MARB
BTAL
Financial Services
MARB
BTAL
Technology
MARB
BTAL
Industrials
MARB
BTAL
Consumer Cyclical
MARB
BTAL
Basic Materials
MARB
-
BTAL
Consumer Defensive
MARB
-
BTAL
Energy
MARB
-
BTAL
Utilities
MARB
-
BTAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARB vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank
MARB
BTAL
MARB vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARB | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.72 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | -0.99 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.98 | -1.72 | +22.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARB | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | -1.72 | +2.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | -0.24 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | -0.24 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
MARB vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARB drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARB and BTAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARB | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -50.28% | +38.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -37.50% | +35.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.67% | -45.16% | +41.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.67% | -45.16% | +41.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | -49.93% | +49.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -21.95% | +20.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 21.54% | -21.24% |
Volatility
MARB vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) is 0.47%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that MARB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARB | BTAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 7.54% | -7.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 15.38% | -13.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 21.59% | -16.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 18.75% | -14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 17.23% | -11.63% |
MARB vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARB has a 2.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARB vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison
MARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than BTAL's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund | 3.10% | 2.49% | 3.49% | 6.14% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 0.39% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 2.98% | 3.01% | 2.11% | 2.20% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARB and BTAL have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to MARB (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARB dropped -11.99% vs BTAL's -50.28%.
On 5-year performance, MARB leads with 2.64% vs -4.56% for BTAL. On fees, BTAL is cheaper at 2.11% per year. On volatility, MARB has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MARB has performed better with a 2.64% return vs -4.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BTAL is cheaper with a 2.11% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.
BTAL has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.98% for MARB.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AGF. Their fees differ too: 2.30% for MARB and 2.11% for BTAL.
MARB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARB and BTAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer