MARB vs. BENJ
MARB (First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF) and BENJ (Horizon Landmark ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MARB is a Long-Short fund actively managed by First Trust, while BENJ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Horizon. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MARB returned 6.18% vs 3.81% for BENJ. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. MARB charges 2.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BENJ.
Performance
MARB vs. BENJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MARB achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than BENJ's 1.47% return.
MARB
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BENJ
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MARB vs. BENJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 1.26% | 6.80% |
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 1.47% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MARB and BENJ is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | -0.09 |
The correlation between MARB and BENJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MARB vs. BENJ — Risk / Return Rank
MARB
BENJ
MARB vs. BENJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) and Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MARB | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 5.02 | -3.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 9.79 | -7.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.98 | 46.19 | -25.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MARB | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 5.70 | -4.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 6.43 | -6.07 |
Drawdowns
MARB vs. BENJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MARB drawdown since its inception was -11.99%, which is greater than BENJ's maximum drawdown of -0.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MARB and BENJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MARB | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.99% | -0.39% | -11.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -0.39% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -0.02% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.30% | 0.08% | +0.22% |
Volatility
MARB vs. BENJ - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF (MARB) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to Horizon Landmark ETF (BENJ) at 0.06%. This indicates that MARB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BENJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MARB | BENJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 0.06% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.18% | 0.23% | +1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.31% | 0.67% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.27% | 0.60% | +3.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.60% | 0.60% | +5.00% |
MARB vs. BENJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MARB has a 2.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BENJ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
MARB vs. BENJ - Dividend Comparison
MARB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, while BENJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BENJ Horizon Landmark ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MARB First Trust Merger Arbitrage ETF | 2.98% | 3.01% | 2.11% | 2.20% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MARB and BENJ have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MARB has higher volatility (0.47%) compared to BENJ (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MARB dropped -11.99% vs BENJ's -0.39%.
On 1-year performance, MARB leads with 6.18% vs 3.81% for BENJ. On fees, BENJ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BENJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MARB has performed better with a 6.18% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BENJ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 2.30% for MARB.
MARB has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.00% for BENJ.
MARB is categorized as Long-Short, while BENJ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 2.30% for MARB and 0.40% for BENJ.
BENJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.70 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MARB and BENJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer