MAPP vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MAPP is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Harbor, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. MAPP is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, MAPP returned 18.03% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MAPP charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

MAPP vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAPP achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

MAPP

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -0.96%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAPP vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	5.16%	18.67%	14.25%	3.86%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MAPP and IBID is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.12

The correlation between MAPP and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MAPP vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAPP vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MAPP	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	3.19	-1.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	5.38	-2.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.72	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.93	7.20	-4.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.09	29.14	-18.05

MAPP vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAPP and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MAPP vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAPP drawdown since its inception was -12.92%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAPP and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAPP	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-1.28%	-11.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.17%	-0.55%	-5.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.59%	-0.55%	-2.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.39%	-0.22%	-1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	0.13%	+1.50%

Volatility

MAPP vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that MAPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAPP	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	0.35%	+4.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.26%	0.86%	+7.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	1.23%	+8.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.98%	2.24%	+8.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.98%	2.24%	+8.74%

MAPP vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAPP has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

MAPP vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.82%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.82%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MAPP and IBID in my portfolio?

MAPP and IBID have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MAPP or IBID?

MAPP has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAPP dropped -12.92% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, MAPP or IBID?

On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 18.03% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MAPP or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MAPP or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MAPP or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.82% for MAPP.

What is the main difference between MAPP and IBID?

MAPP is categorized as Global Allocation, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.92% for MAPP and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.