MANA vs. BTC
MANA (Grayscale Decentraland Trust) and BTC (Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Grayscale. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MANA returned -76.92% vs -44.62% for BTC. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MANA vs. BTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MANA achieves a -42.20% return, which is significantly lower than BTC's -25.64% return.
MANA
- 1D
- -11.76%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- 6M
- -50.41%
- YTD
- -42.20%
- 1Y
- -76.92%
- 3Y*
- -58.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -51.20%
BTC
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- 6M
- -31.88%
- YTD
- -25.64%
- 1Y
- -44.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -1.21%
MANA vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust | -42.20% | -91.36% | -0.00% |
BTC Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF | -25.64% | -7.50% | 41.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between MANA and BTC is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MANA vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank
MANA
BTC
MANA vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MANA | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.83 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.84 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.34 | +0.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MANA vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MANA drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than BTC's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANA and BTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MANA | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.28% | -53.30% | -45.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -85.85% | -53.30% | -32.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.02% | -48.17% | -50.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.06% | -18.85% | -53.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.64% | 33.36% | +26.28% |
Volatility
MANA vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) has a higher volatility of 42.29% compared to Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) at 10.53%. This indicates that MANA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MANA | BTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.29% | 10.53% | +31.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.49% | 34.53% | +57.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 119.30% | 44.33% | +74.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 174.05% | 47.83% | +126.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 174.05% | 47.83% | +126.22% |
Dividends
MANA vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MANA nor BTC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MANA and BTC have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MANA has higher volatility (42.29%) compared to BTC (10.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANA dropped -99.28% vs BTC's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, BTC leads with -44.62% vs -76.92% for MANA. On volatility, BTC has been the lower-risk option at 10.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTC has performed better with a -44.62% return vs -76.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MANA and BTC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
MANA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MANA and BTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer