MANA vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

MANA (Grayscale Decentraland Trust) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. MANA is actively managed, while BITI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MANA returned -58.04%/yr vs -31.96%/yr for BITI. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

MANA vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MANA achieves a -42.20% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 23.04% return.

MANA

• 1D: -11.76%
• 1M: -11.76%
• 6M: -50.41%
• YTD: -42.20%
• 1Y: -76.92%
• 3Y*: -58.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -51.20%

BITI

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -3.89%
• 6M: 34.67%
• YTD: 23.04%
• 1Y: 59.90%
• 3Y*: -31.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -36.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MANA vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust	-42.20%	-91.36%	-28.08%	756.41%	-79.69%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	23.04%	-1.76%	-62.60%	-66.17%	3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MANA and BITI is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022	-0.19

The correlation between MANA and BITI shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MANA vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MANA

MANA Risk / Return Rank: 3
MANA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
MANA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
MANA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 47
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MANA vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MANA	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	1.37	-2.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.91	1.94	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.23	-0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	2.38	-3.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	5.89	-7.18

MANA vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MANA Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MANA and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MANA vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MANA drawdown since its inception was -99.28%, which is greater than BITI's maximum drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MANA and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	MANA	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.28%	-92.16%	-7.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-85.85%	-25.28%	-60.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.28%	-84.63%	-14.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.02%	-86.57%	-12.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.06%	-68.43%	-3.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.64%	10.20%	+49.44%

Volatility

MANA vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Decentraland Trust (MANA) has a higher volatility of 42.29% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 10.54%. This indicates that MANA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MANA	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.29%	10.54%	+31.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	92.49%	34.05%	+58.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	119.30%	44.17%	+75.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	174.05%	52.19%	+121.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	174.05%	52.19%	+121.86%

Dividends

MANA vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

MANA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.80%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.80%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%
MANA Grayscale Decentraland Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MANA and BITI in my portfolio?

MANA and BITI have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MANA or BITI?

MANA has higher volatility (42.29%) compared to BITI (10.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MANA dropped -99.28% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, MANA or BITI?

On 3-year performance, BITI leads with -31.96% vs -58.04% for MANA. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 10.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MANA or BITI?

Over the 3-year period, BITI has performed better with a -31.96% return vs -58.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MANA or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.80%, compared with 0.00% for MANA.

What is the main difference between MANA and BITI?

They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.