PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MAMOX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MoA Moderate Allocation Fund (MAMOX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MAMOX achieves a 6.93% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.55% return.


MAMOX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.17%
YTD
6.93%
6M
7.49%
1Y
18.18%
3Y*
12.67%
5Y*
5.99%
10Y*

SICIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
MAMOX
MoA Moderate Allocation Fund
6.93%15.45%10.12%11.57%-14.51%11.46%870.51%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.55%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between MAMOX and SICIX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.68

The correlation between MAMOX and SICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MAMOX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAMOX
MAMOX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MAMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MAMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MoA Moderate Allocation Fund (MAMOX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MAMOXSICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.48

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

2.63

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.13

10.22

+4.91

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAMOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAMOX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MAMOXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

2.49

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.85

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.80

-0.64

Drawdowns

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAMOX drawdown since its inception was -21.38%, smaller than the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAMOX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MAMOXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.38%

-27.62%

+6.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.48%

-2.65%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-3.21%

-7.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.05%

-10.94%

-9.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-3.57%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

0.68%

+0.63%

Volatility

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

MoA Moderate Allocation Fund (MAMOX) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that MAMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MAMOXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.57%

0.74%

+1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

2.11%

+4.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.42%

2.80%

+5.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

3.88%

+9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

378.92%

3.90%

+375.02%

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAMOX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MAMOX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

MAMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.92%, more than SICIX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAMOX
MoA Moderate Allocation Fund
9.92%10.61%8.01%3.64%11.53%5.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.83%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


MAMOX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MAMOX has higher volatility (2.57%) compared to SICIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MAMOX dropped -21.38% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

SICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MAMOX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer